If you like this free daily roundup you can subscribe to it either through RSS or email. See the links to either option at the top right of the page. And if you really like it feel free to donate through the button on the top right.
- Jon Huntsman Confirms Beijing’s Belief Of A US Internet Plot Against China | Sinocism –
- “Attack Creators And Propagators Of Internet Rumors Head-On”-A New China Internet Campaign Starting? | DigiCha –
- 电商迎来冬天：需改变规则回归商业本质_互联网_科技时代_新浪网 –
- 发展健康网络文化 推动微博客服务社会 (2)–时政–人民网 –
- 发展健康网络文化 推动微博客服务社会 (3)–时政–人民网 –
- How Many Pinterest Do We Need? | TechNode – 14 Chinese clones so far
- Photos: Smog-shrouded China denies citizens right to know pollutant measurements | Ministry of Tofu 豆腐部 –
- 新华网评：切莫让网络谣言毒害我们善良的心 – 新华评论 – 新华网 –
- 新华网评：网络谣言如“毒品” – 新华评论 – 新华网 –
- 司马昭之心，路人皆知_百度百科 – 成语，意为野心非常明显，为人所共知。司马昭是三国时魏臣，权倾朝野，其党羽曾刺死魏帝曹髦。其子司马炎后来篡魏自立。
- Secrets of the Bailout, Now Revealed – NYTimes.com –
- 王晨主任在《人民日报》发表署名文章：积极开展微博客舆论引导工作 – 11.28 people’s daily article on public opinion management on weibo, written by Wang Chen, head of State Council Internet Office. Campaign to regain control over weibo just starting $sina
- Women in China: The sky’s the limit | The Economist –
- New START’s China Challenge-Heritage Foundation – Part of the coordinated propaganda effort by the neocon “thinkers”/defense industry consultants to start a new nuclear arms race
- How many nuclear-armed countries does Obama want in Asia? – Foreign and Defense Policy – AEI – Part of the coordinated propaganda effort by the neocon “thinkers”/defense industry consultants to start a new nuclear arms race
- MICHAEL PETTIS: Here’s How You Know China Is Overinvesting –
- No, China Does Not Have 3,000 Nuclear Weapons » FAS Strategic Security Blog– but damage done by neocon propagandists behind georgetown “research”//The Georgetown University study has collected an impressive amount of scattered information from the Internet about Chinese underground facilities. That is obviously interesting in and of itself, but in terms of assessing Chinese nuclear capabilities, it does the public debate a disservice by disseminating exaggerated and poorly analyzed information.
Readers can obviously read into the report what they want, but a quick Google search for news article headlines about the report shows the damage: “China may have 3000 n-warheads;” “China’s nuclear arsenal ‘many times larger’ than previously thought;” “China ‘hiding up to 3,000 nuclear warheads in secret tunnels.” Many people will not remember the details, but they tend to remember the headlines. A misperception will stick in the public consciousness that China has 3,000 nuclear weapons hidden in tunnels.
But China does not have 3,000 nuclear weapons. It neither has produced the fissile material needed to build that many, not does it have delivery vehicles enough to delivery that many warheads. The Georgetown University study warhead estimate appears to be off by an order of magnitude.
China is in the middle of a significant military modernization and it is important that it is not hyped or exaggerated but analyzed and understood for what is actually happening.